Details » medical weight loss
- Url: http://medical.informe.com/
- Category: Education
- Description: medical weight loss
- Members: 0
- Created On: Apr 1, 2010
- Posts: 0
- Hits: 8927
Post your rating:
l7rNHx Really informative post.Much thanks again.
Hello, this comment is in repsnose to my banning at the other place. I would like to continue my friendship with you and I apologize if I have upset you with my comments and have not been nice to you. That was not my intention. I am still interested in reading your posts and in continuing our friendship. Thanks,Blackswan
Ypp: Sorry for having ofefednd you.Apology accepted.But if you wish to participate in the discussions, you should not be ofefednd so easily, because its really hard to argue with you.I am not "ofefednd so easily". It takes something truly discourteous and rude like a charge of plagarism to get my hackles up.OK, I can admit that the information you presented is not from Wikipedia but from Enciclopedia Britanica, or maybe you wrote it yourself.Notice how you maintain the same insulting pretense but only manage to bump it up a respective notch by mentioning "Encyclopedia Britannica" instead of Wikipedia? BZZZZT! Thank you for playing, please try again.If you wish to be properly respectful, please try the latter option and then you'll be on the right track. That post took over ONE HOUR to compose as I winnowed through many obscure and less-readable sources to locate readily digested information.Hope, that will partially expiate my fault.That is up to you and whether you can refrain from making libelous assertions in the future. Regarding women, who are the most precious commodity.While women are, indeed, "precious" in more than one sense of the term I find personal integrity and morality, in man or woman, to be of far greater value.Consider this: How wonderful is it to have attracted a given woman if her fidelity to you is entirely dependent upon your ability to furnish this lady with non-essential trinkets and ornaments like gold or, even, diamonds? (We'll disregard how diamonds would most likely be priced just like gold in an open and fair marketplace.)Shouldn't a woman look more towards personal integrity, fidelity, loyalty, courage, productivity and decency instead of any ability to provide more tangible but less reliable demonstrations of personal affection?I agree completely. I believe, the [that?] capital, initially valued by women, [then] started to have value for men too, and actually started to symbolize women itself.So, where does this exclude my own observations about tool-making capabilities? I forcefully assert that a man's ability to barter for or manufacture tools (i.e., points, blades, scrapers, shafts, etc.), that kept his mate and children well-fed preceeded by far any allure which the offering of gold, diamonds or even shell beads might have obtained.Millennia ago, sheer and simple SURVIVAL accounted for so much of a man's or woman's worth that including the more advanced notions of ornamentation, complex metallurgy and decorative arts is entirely misguided. Do you deny this?I cannot present any material proof for this thesis.That is more than abundantly clear.That's the advantage of materialists, they can always present some numbers, like density or resistance, to prove their point, but I cannot.To quote Homer Simpson, "You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!"Is that my fault or yours?My problem, must admit that.The truth outs at last.Please reply when you have more substantial evidence than libelous accusations or anecdotal evidence that is entirely unsupported by the historical record.While I would like to show some appreciation for your eventual admission that the anecdotal evidence you presented was only just that, you've yet to provide anything remotely resembling factual material to support your assertions. Until you do, please understand that I am ethically bound to reject any such claims that you might make.
Hello, this comment is in repssnoe to my banning at the other place. I would like to continue my friendship with you and I apologize if I have upset you with my comments and have not been nice to you. That was not my intention. I am still interested in reading your posts and in continuing our friendship. Thanks,Blackswan
, you can't just make yourself gay. (Also, I think it would be inlnutisg to turn to women if you're not actually attracted to them, like they're just the backup option.)I also felt like you did when I was younger, uncomfortable and leery of the popular construction of true love without really knowing why. Privileging the narrative of (heterosexual) monogamy > marriage > kids is a perfect way of maintaining the status quo of the gender hierarchy, even though it's disguised as something for women (because men don't like that icky romance stuff). Let's not even start on the idea that we must have a boyfriend to be happy.I'm lucky enough that, not only is my boyfriend pro-feminist, we actually started dating before I came to feminism, and he followed me through that transformation instead of fleeing in terror. (What are the odds?) Sometimes he is less sexist or at least better about being educated about it than some women I know. Of course this doesn't contradict the fact that most women are smarter about sexism than most men. But if I had judged all men according to that trend, then I would have missed out on my boyfriend. This is partly what I wanted to say in that post of mine that you linked you can't always judge individuals according to the broad trends displayed by the group. You just have to hold out for the good ones, few as they may be.
This is my first time posting a ressonpe here. I'm sorry if it's too long as I work through my thoughts. I have a dissenting view about the lesbian stereotype. I don't feel it's always homophobic to worry about whether or not feminists are portrayed as mostly lesbians or other specific groups/types, because such images influence people's understanding of the applications of feminism. It's human nature to try to rectify the wrongs that affect you personally. I'm not lesbian, but I do have some class rage after a lifetime of seeing my parents struggle in a so-called equitable society. So I gravitate towards movements that speak to my personal glass ceiling, even though I want equality for everyone. So stereotypes that seem to limit feminism's interests to one group are problematic, not out of homophobia, but because sexual orientation is among all gender/class/race ideas that demand political attention. Using lesbian identity as a defining feature of feminists may be homophobic, but it might also have the effect of distancing non-homophobes who are seeking general political agendas for equality.To be honest, I've avoided active feminism as a result of one negative stereotype in particular: the idea that feminists fault men as individuals for male privilege as a class. BetaCandy's phrase the patriarchy hates men is a spark of hope for me. In my heart, I know I am a feminist. I agree with the goals and terms of feminism, but I've resisted feminism out of an aversion to generalizing male privilege because, I guess, my father exemplifies the soft-spoken, hard-working, struggling citizen, who didn't have the luxury of education and who has never expressed a word or act of oppression.It's true, the patriarchy hates men! The patriarchy takes away the voice of male victims. While feminists can and should point out inequities of gender, many men can't point to their exclusion from power, because there is ostensibly no reason for it. This is the patriarchy's trick on all of us. It sets up a group of powerholders; and people who are visibly identifiable with that group are taught to respect that power (after all, they might be lucky enough to share in it one day, they are told), OR they resent the power but have no voice against it. If we are all given the chance to pursue positions in that structure, we will all be in the shut up and work harder boat. It is a system that depends on oppression, using any pretext. So how do we change that? (I don't know).I'm sorry if my ressonpe got a little long or noisy I do get swept with enthusiasm, especially because I realized that stereotypes have kept me at arms length.
Kewl you should come up with that. Exnlleect!
En Alicante lo que se soleda hacer era ir a pescar el pulpo a la playa, y luego lo dejas secar (ya murteo, claro este1). Recuerdo que de pequef1a pasaba por unos pisos donde un sef1or siempre teneda colgados pulpos a secar en las cuerdas de tender la ropa; me llamaba mucho la atencif3n. La cosa es que este9 en un lugar seco pero aireado. Una vez ased se suele echar durante el af1o a los guisos de pescado con patatas. Tambie9n es corriente asarlo al fuego (en una cocina de gas tb vale)y te lo comes ased. Incluso hay un tipo de pescado con el que se hace lo mismo: los capellanes'. Una vez secos se churrascan en el fuego y con un chorrito de aceite te los comes este1n riquedsimos. a1La cocina mediterre1nea!
Hi! Thanks a lot for this useful video. By the way, I hear many plpeoe keep on talking about Kinovelax Diet Plan (google it), but I'm not sure if? it is really good. Have you thought about Kinovelax Diet Plan? I have heard many extraordinary things about it and my buddy lost tons of weight with it, but she refuses to tell me